Blake Lively Not Huge Fan of Seventeen Cover
Gossip Girl beauty Blake Lively graces three magazine covers this month - Vanity Fair, Cosmopolitan and Seventeen.
But according to the New York Posts, her Gossip Girl reps only liked two of the three - Vanity Fair and Cosmopolitan.
"Her camp is not thrilled about her Seventeen cover," said one source. "Her rep felt the Seventeen photo looked nothing like Blake."
Blake Lively's flack continued with another source quoted by the newspaper saying that she was exactly "over the moon" about the Seventeen shot herself. We're curious what you think about it, though ...
What do you think of Blake Lively's Seventeen cover photo?





July 11th, 2008 11:10 AM
scarlett johansen is on the cover of the cosmopolitan. i don't think blake is unless its the september issue. does anybody know??
July 11th, 2008 1:04 PM
Blake Lively looks great but I just wish they would have made her look a little more realistic instead of airbrushing the cover.
July 11th, 2008 1:18 PM
You know, even before I read this, ages ago I saw the cover and thought, WOW that's a REALLY bad picture.
Seriously, Blake Lively is gorgeous and really beautiful, and then they choose this picture for the cover?!
I was really gutted for her and disappointed with Seventeen as well, they should know better than to pick this picture, especially for their cover.
I understand that not all photos can be great, even with celebrities, but that is why the editor's job (or whoever it is) is to pick good ones for magazines.
Just my opinion
LOVE gossip girl btw, the site is awesome i come here all the time!
x
July 11th, 2008 3:36 PM
there are multiple Blake Lively covers in this issue of seventeen magazine. there are like 3 of them. i think the 2nd cover should have been the ACTUAL cover. not this one. but everyone has different opinions.
July 11th, 2008 8:01 PM
What magazine covers have Blake Lively on the cover? I know Seventeen and Vanity Fair but i don't think she is on the cover of Cosmo does anyone know???
July 11th, 2008 8:57 PM
it does not look like her at all! When I first saw this I could not even believe it was she! Seventeen should know better than this, just because not as many people may read this as those who read vanity fair or cosmo, does not warrant an unattractive picture of their cover girl (who is so gorgeous in reality!!!!)
July 11th, 2008 10:51 PM
i don't like this picture she's a natural beauty and the other two covers were fantastic...this one is definitely retouched and blake lively is alreay perfect why ruin it trying to amp her already fantastic beauty?!
July 12th, 2008 4:57 PM
Ewww..this picture is not a very flattering one of Blake..
July 14th, 2008 2:03 AM
i dont think this is a great photo she looks younger and i dno just not her best.
short and sweet. =]
July 14th, 2008 5:26 AM
i think its an ok photo, but it could definetly be better
its so obviously air-brushed. she doesnt even need it.
Magazines should stop doing that all the time and just show the natural beauty of the people they choose to put on there covers.
July 17th, 2008 10:11 PM
Look, Blake is a really gorgeous girl..
i bought that issue also!
because i love her :D
but, this picture doesnt show
that shes the gorgeous blond that she really is!
im not crazy about it either
July 20th, 2008 9:33 AM
I bought this and i agree the 2nd one should have been the cover.this one looks nothin like her its like they've made her face too tanned and she is naturally pretty.I love GG.
July 21st, 2008 3:18 PM
Being a photo editor and creative director/producer of photography, I am apalled by seeing this cover. The art director or Editor in chief should have never approved this photo to go out. It is over airbrushed, they manipulated too many things from her hair, her face and even her body shape. The angle of her face, her squinty eyes and her smirky smile, also are not very appealing for a front cover. The cover should be amazing, and this one is far from it.